Don't Close George's Pork and Poultry at Audlem

To: Ms Wendy Capelle (wendy.capelle@canalrivertrust.org.uk)

North Wales & Borders Waterways
Canal & River Trust
Navigation Road
Northwich
CW8 1BH
Copies to:
Crewe Guardian (crewe@guardiangrp.co.uk);
Crewe Chronicle (Editor: Michael Green crewe.news@cheshirenews.co.uk);
Shropshire Star (newsroom@shropshirestar.co.uk );
Audlem online (editor@audlem.org)



Dear Ms Capelle
I was appalled to learn that, despite a petition of support from boaters and local people you have decided to pull the rug from under a thriving canalside business in Audlem.
George's Pork and Poultry, situated beside the bottom lock at Audlem has became a feature of the canal scene and is regarded as a valuable resource by boaters like myself and local people, having transformed the derelict lock-side land with beds of delicious vegetables as well as providing local meat. It is just the sort of local family business the modern canal system needs.
Despite that – and promises to ensure the business survived – you have decided to withdraw his lease and the clearly pre-prepared excuses in your press release and being made by your public relations staff in online forums are pathetically inadequate.
Your excuses for closure seem to centre around the modest shed Danny George has erected alongside the existing brick-built hut. You complain it is out of keeping with the heritage value of the hut yet you have suggested a larger, uglier, portacabin as an alternative.
As that clearly isn't adequate as an excuse to put a family out of business you also play the health and safety card, claiming to be concerned about people having to cross the lock beams to buy their vegetables.
This is, indeed, curious as tens of thousands of boaters cross lock beams like these every year. Within 200 yards of the business there are locks that have to be crossed from the towpath to reach moorings on the offside and there is another canalside shop by the top lock at Adderley where buyers have to cross the lock beam to buy eggs and cakes.
Overall your excuses for closing down this business are entirely inadequate and will damage the public and boaters' attitudes to the new Canal and River Trust as it attempts to persuade people to support it financially and by volunteering. Who would want to give cash or time to an organisation that acts in such a high-handed manner with an innovative waterside business, established with a great deal of hard work by Danny George and his family.
I ask you to rescind this nasty, short-sighted decision immediately and, instead of seeking reasons why this business should close, do everything in your considerable power to keep it open and demonstrate that the Canal and River Trust will support waterways businesses and help them top thrive.



Yours



Peter Underwood
nb Blackberry Way, 

How the Boaters' Manifesto happened

Find something positive to say about the Canal and River Trust was the challenge thrown down by former canal magazine editor Kevin Blick– and I responded like a dog chasing a bone.

My trust in BW, at least at senior management level, had evaporated and - as much as I believe the waterways should be cared for properly by the taxpayer - I was reluctantly having to admit that the current bunch of right wing ideologues in government were unlikely to abandon their cost saving plan of tossing the waterways away to save a few quid.

That left the Canal and River Trust and I could see that boaters, and especially those who live on the system or spend much of their lives on the water did need to face the new reality of the Trust and tell those creating it what was needed.

So was born the Boaters’ Manifesto. I asked for contributions online, some of you may have seen my requests on a whole variety of Facebook pages, or on Twitter and then I put them all together.

Everyone looked at it again and we fine-tuned it before the manifesto, created by a group of boaters, was sent to the Transition Trustees, the IWA and the members of the parliamentary waterways group.

It is now being discussed by the IWA and members of the parliamentary group and a direct meeting is planned with the Transition Trustees of the proposed new Canal and River Trust.

I think the manifesto is a worthwhile document and gives a voice to real boaters – well I would, wouldn’t I?

Getting it together has been interesting, especially as the contributions have all been made online and opinions vary according to perspective, with everyone, including me, having their axes to grind. I am pleased that we have got agreement from such a disparate bunch on a simple set of demands.

If the Transition Trustees can move some way towards us there is a tremendous reward in sight for the new charity because experienced boaters who spend much if not all of their lives on the system have already got a great deal of personal and financial capital invested in it.

We need to see a successful organisation running our waterways and doing so in a way that allows our investment to remain worthwhile. If the Canal and River Trust can convince us they are the people to do that there is a great wealth of enthusiasm, commitment and knowledge amongst boaters that can be tapped in a way that BW could never manage.

My next task is to put together a team to present the Manifesto to the trustees from amongst boaters I have only met electronically, each speaking on a section of the manifesto and possibly doing so from a variety of BW regional offices on a video link.

Remind me again why I started this?

How not to make friends for the waterways

Sally Ash strikes again! The poorly titled Head of Boating for British Waterways has acquired a reputation as something of a pit bull when it comes to dealing with boaters.
She seems to find it difficult to relate to boaters in any way and usually fails to understand how valuable boats are to the waterways. Many report the feeling that her ideal is a canal and river system with all the boaters neatly penned in marina.
Now, as the Guardian reports, she is using the Olympics as an excuse to hound live-aboard boaters off the River Lea.
If British Waterways is to become an effective charity it will need something more than local councils and the 'great and good' to enable it to keep the canal system going. Most of all, it will need the support of those people who know the canals and rivers best, the people who spend most of their lives on boats on the system.
Sally Ash has done little in her time in office but alienate not just boaters but several of the voluntary organisations linked with the waterways. I wonder if she hasn't become more of a liability than an asset at a time when British Waterways needs friends like never before.
Two things would help - the departure of Sally Ash and the over-paid directors like Robin Evans halving their enormous salaries.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/mar/09/houseboaters-socially-cleansed-olympics

When ecology meets commerce on the canals

A developer is aiming to put a 90 berth marina on the Montgomergy Canal, which will eventually link Britian's busiest canal - the Llangollen - with the pretty Welsh border towns of Welshpool and Newtown.
The marina, at Queen's Head near Oswestry, seems to have the backing of the local council and British Waterways but it will prove to be a headache for the naturalists and ecologists who see the canal as some sort of linear nature reserve rather than a navigation for narrowboats.
Currently there are severe restrictions on the number of boats able to use the canal and parts of it are within a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Rare plants and insects thrive in the weedy margins of the seven mile stretch of canal currently opened and boaters are limited to speeds as low as 2mph in places with one-way traffic in some sections.
It is difficult to see that limit, or the current limit of a few hundred boats a year surviving the influx of a large marina.
It may well improve the prospect of opening the currently closed section with another 11 mile stretch around Welspool which is already re-opened. If that happens, the number of boats will increase dramatically as Welshpool will become as popular as Llangollen as a destination.
It is difficult to see the harmony of plants insects and boats surviving the return of the Montgomery canal to full working status but both the local councils and British Waterways need the extra income.

Canal threat to regeneration

REGENERATION schemes across Greater Manchester worth hundreds of millions of pounds could be damaged - thanks to what one Labour ex-minister describes as ‘an almighty cock up’ and ‘criminal irresponsibility’ by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs over the handling of subsidies to farmers.
The link between a rural scandal and a threat to the rebuilding of depressed city areas comes because Defra has decided to raid the grants it makes to its client organisations.
One of those is British Waterways which faces seeing £70m ripped from its budget to help make up for Defra’s £200m shortfall - caused by what Labour MP Michael Meacher says is ‘criminal irresponsibility’ over the handling of £1.5bn of European farm subsidies.
As a result, hundreds of miles of canals are now facing neglect and possible closure – especially the recently re-opened Rochdale and Huddersfield Narrow canals as well as the Ashton and Peak Forest canals.
In Manchester those canals are key to major regeneration schemes including hundreds of millions being spent in East Manchester where canals are so important they have even built the first new one for 250 years – a short stretch linking the Rochdale and the Ashton canals.
Despite intense pressure for silent compliance from Defra, British Waterways will unattributably brief anyone who will listen that the budget cuts will leave them unable to keep canals maintained and a catastrophic incident could soon close vulnerable canals completely, as they would no longer have the money for repairs.
The Rochdale and Huddersfield Narrow canals are particularly susceptible as they were reopened on a shoestring and are in a fragile state. The Rochdale has only recently reopened for a second time after a £2m, 18-month long, repair - just the sort of problem that could close it completely in the future.
Defra’s decision has left many of the region’s MPs fuming and Michael Meacher, who has the Rochdale Canal passing through his Oldham constituency is organising a deputation of regional MPs to Barry Gardiner the junior minister who has responsibility for waterways at Defra.
Tony Lloyd, the Labour MP whose central Manchester constituency includes the massive East Manchester regeneration area describes the canals as the ‘blue lung’ of the city.
“If this goes ahead we are likely to see the canals become inadequately maintained then restricted or closed. That is just not a direction we ought to be going in.”
He believes such a development would ‘tarnish the regeneration effort’ making it less than it could be.
“It is not just New Islington that needs the canals, it is the council estates further out. I don’t want to go back to the days when people were afraid to walk along the canal bank.
“The Manchester canals are some of the jewels in Defra’s crown and it doesn’t cost much to keep it polished.”
Tameside Labour MP, David Heyes said: “I have four canals in my constituency. It really makes no sense to have invested so heavily in refurbishing all these canals in recent years and for that investment to be - potentially - at risk.
“Many of the economic development aims for the constituency are being promoted and marketed around the attractions of their waterside locations. This is certainly true in Failsworth, Hollinwood, Droylsden and town centre Ashton.
“To lose those benefits in some of our least prosperous urban locations would be a real irony if it is to compensate for a cock-up in paying farm subsidies to what are often the most prosperous rural areas.”
There is cross-party support and Rochdale’s Liberal MP Paul Rowen is demanding a meeting with Defra Secretary of State David Milliband, “to discuss exactly why British Waterways have had their grant cut and I want a firm assurance that Rochdale Canal will not be under threat.
“It is not acceptable that one of the jewels in Rochdale’s crown is threatened in this way.”
Michael Meacher wants to know why the Defra has not sacked the civil servants responsible for the “almighty cock-up” over subsidy payments.
He said: “It is not acceptable there should be any cuts in British Waterways budget. It is completely indefensible and inequitable that our flagship policy of urban regeneration around canals should be affected.
“This is vandalism and I will be asking Barry Gardiner to accept a delegation of MPs from the areas affected and asking him to explain himself.”
In Tameside, Labour councillor Kieran Quinn, who has responsibility for regeneration, said: “Stalybridge has been transformed from a sleepy town to an exciting commercial centre by regeneration around the canal and we know that a living canal brings social regeneration as well.
“We also see the same thing happening at Droylsden where a whole redevelopment is to happen around the canal. If we don’t have a open and useable canal people will look at the whole scheme differently.
“We support British Waterways to retain their grant in full and we will be lobbying Defra and the Treasury.”
Leader of Oldham Council, Councillor David Jones said: “We see the Rochdale Canal as central to the continued redevelopment of Chadderton and Failsworth centres. We will be seeking an urgent meeting with British Waterways to discuss the current situation and to try to resolve theses issues.“
It is ironic that just a few weeks earlier John Prescott’s farewell speech in the Labour conference in Manchester hailed the fact that the canals in the city has ‘become major engines of urban regeneration’ as one of the successes of his reign at the top of Defra.
Now Defra is hacking £9m from the already allocated British Waterways budget for this year and telling Chief Executive Robin Evans that he has to budget for cuts of £12m a year for the next five years under the Comprehensive Spending Review being considered by Cabinet in the coming months.
The draconian cuts this year have already meant vital maintenance work for this winter has been cancelled on British Waterways’ 2,200 miles of navigable canals and rivers. Eugene Baston, of British Waterways, said: " If we can't maintain the waterways, we can't keep them open.”
Bolton based John Fletcher is National Chairman of The Inland Waterways Association and heads up the efforts to reopen the disused Manchester Bolton and Bury Canal – planned to be a vital catalyst in the regeneration of much of Salford.
He said: “The next few years could reverse all the progress of the last ten years and the Rochdale and Huddersfield Narrow canals are especially vulnerable because they are fragile and there will be no funds to repair and re-open them if something expensive goes wrong – and that could happen tomorrow.
“British Waterways and the other partners could even be compelled to repay the lottery grants if the canals are not kept open and that could bankrupt the whole organisation.
“It is ridiculous that this should be put at risk because Defra cannot pay farmers on time. It seems that they are less fit for purpose than the Home Office.”
Restored canals are now seen as the engine of regeneration. Much of the redevelopment of inner city East Manchester is built around the canal system, with Urban Splash’s remarkable new CHIPS building to be constructed along side a new canal, linking the Ashton with the Rochdale soon after they split, rising out of the city centre.
The reopening of the Huddersfield Narrow and Rochdale canals has already brought new development in places like Stalybridge, Failsworth and Mossley, with more to come.
There seems no limit to the investment that working canals can attract.
Work has started to build a new £25m canal-side marina in Greenfield, in Oldham featuring luxury homes, offices, shops, restaurants and bars.
It is in East Manchester that Urban Splash is a key player in the New Islington development and Nick Johnson, Deputy Chief Executive, said: “I don’t think it will affect the decision to go ahead with the East Manchester regeneration, but I am disappointed.
“It is very frustrating if the effect is to close parts of the waterways down. Fully 85 per cent of our developments are next to water because we believe that brings something quite special.
“The whole concept of New Islington has been built around creating a community that includes people living on and working from boats.
“If the canals are closed we lose one of the dimensions of the development at New Islington which is important to the whole regeneration.
“It is rooted in tradition and the canals are part of rebuilding a sustainable community.
“Government sometimes don’t understand what makes a regeneration sustainable and living, moving canals are part of the whole picture.”
Tom Russell, who heads up the New East Manchester Urban Regeneration Company, is reluctant to discuss what he believes to be ‘speculation’ about possible canal closures. Of course, he also looks to the Treasury for some of his funding.
British Waterways initial response to Defra’s demand for £60m more in budget cuts has been to come up with a package offering cuts of £5m a year rather than Defra’s £12m – but even that it means losing 180 jobs by April as well as cuts in essential canal maintenance.
The additional £7m a year being demanded by Defra would certainly impact on vulnerable canals according to the experts inside and outside the organisation.
So far the junior minister responsible for waterways, Barry Gardiner, has refused to address the potential problems faced by those trying to regenerate inner city areas using the canals.
His spokesman would only offer a bland general statement issued to all journalists, which praises the past successes of British Waterways and goes on to say: “… whilst Defra wishes to do everything it can to support the vision of British Waterways' board, they are aware that Defra is now operating within a very tight fiscal regime.
"We are grateful for the constructive way British Waterways has engaged with the department to identify efficiency savings and remain confident that British Waterways will continue to deliver real public benefit and regeneration in the future."
Within the region the only MP willing to stand up for Defra’s attempts to cut the waterways budget is another government minister, Phil Woolas, also representing Oldham, who has responsibility for local government and community cohesion – including neighbourhood renewal.
He said: “I am not convinced of British Waterway's case. I do not have the information yet but I am wary of such press reports, particularly when they play politics in the CSR period. To say that the waterways are being cut because of a ‘Defra cock up’ is presumptuous. The future financial allocations are not yet known and it is out of order for British Waterways to lobby in this way.” He failed to answer follow-up questions about his curious stance.